【Debian管理员手册】第 13 章 工作站

13.1. 配置 X11 服务
13.2. 定制图形界面
13.2.1. 选择显示管理器
13.2.2. 选择窗口管理器
13.2.3. 菜单管理
13.3. 图形桌面
13.3.1. GNOME
13.3.2. KDE and Plasma
13.3.3. Xfce 和其他
13.3.4. Other Desktop Environments
13.4. 邮件
13.4.1. Evolution
13.4.2. KMail
13.4.3. Thunderbird
13.5. 网页浏览器
13.6. 开发
13.6.1. GNOME中 GTK+ 工具
13.6.2. Tools for Qt
13.7. 通力合作
13.7.1. 团队合作:groupware
13.7.2. 使用 FusionForge 协同工作
13.8. 办公软件包
13.9. 模拟 Windows:Wine
13.10. Real-Time Communications software

现在服务器已经部署完毕,管理员可以集中精力单独安装并配置典型工作站了。

13.1. 配置 X11 服务

A brief reminder: X.org is the software component that allows graphical applications to display windows on screen. It includes a driver that makes efficient use of the video card. The features offered to the graphical applications are exported through a standard interface,
X11 (
Buster contains version
X11R7.7).

观点 X11, XFree86 and X.org

X11 is the graphical system most widely used on Unix-like systems (also available for Windows and Mac OS). Strictly speaking, the term “X11” only refers to a protocol specification, but it is also used to refer to the implementation in practice. X11 had a rough start, but the 1990s saw XFree86 emerge as the reference implementation because it was free software, portable, and maintained by a collaborative community. However, the rate of evolution slowed down near the end when the software only gained new drivers. That situation, along with a very controversial license change, led to the X.org fork in 2004. This is now the reference implementation, and Debian
Buster uses X.org version 7.7. Current versions of X.org are able to autodetect the available hardware: this applies to the video card and the monitor, as well as keyboards and mice; in fact, it is so convenient that the package no longer even creates a
/etc/X11/xorg.conf configuration file. 键盘的配置保存在
/etc/default/keyboard。该文件用于配置文本控制台也用于图形界面,由
keyboard-configuration 处理。配置键盘布局的细节在第 8.1.2 节 “键盘配置”中。
xserver-xorg-core 软件包提供X.org 7.x系列的通用X 服务。该服务是模块化的并使用一套相互独立的驱动来处理很多不同类型的显卡。安装
xserver-xorg 确保服务和至少一种显卡驱动被安装。 Note that if the detected video card is not handled by any of the available drivers, X.org tries using the
vesa and
fbdev drivers. VESA is a generic driver that should work everywhere, but with limited capabilities (fewer available resolutions, no hardware acceleration for games and visual effects for the desktop, and so on) while
fbdev works on top of the kernel’s framebuffer device. Nowadays the X server can run without any administrative privileges (this used to be required to be able to configure the screen) and its log file is then stored in the user’s home directory in
~/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log, whereas it is
/var/log/Xorg.0.log for X servers started with root privileges and for versions older than Debian 9
Stetch. That log file is where one would look to know what driver is currently in use. For example, the following snippet matches what the
intel driver outputs when it is loaded:

(==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 0
(==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 1
(==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 2
(==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 3
(==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout
(II) LoadModule: "intel"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so

其他 专利驱动

Some video card makers (most notably NVIDIA) refuse to publish the hardware specifications that would be required to implement good free drivers. They do, however, provide proprietary drivers that allow using their hardware. This policy is nefarious, because even when the provided driver exists, it is usually not as polished as it should be; more importantly, it does not necessarily follow the X.org updates, which may prevent the latest available driver from loading correctly (or at all). We cannot condone this behavior, and we recommend you avoid these makers and favor more cooperative manufacturers. If you still end up with such a card, you will find the required packages in the
non-free section:
nvidia-driver for NVIDIA cards. It requires a matching kernel module. Building the module can be automated by installing the package
nvidia-kernel-dkms (for NVIDIA). The “nouveau” project aims to develop a free software driver for NVIDIA cards and is the default driver that you get for those cards in Debian. In general, its feature set and performance do not match the proprietary driver. In the developers’ defense, we should mention that the required information can only be gathered by reverse engineering, which makes things difficult. The free drivers for ATI video cards, called “radeon” and “amdgpu”, are much better in that regard although it often requires non-free firmware from the
firmware-amd-graphics package.

文章来源网络,作者:管理,如若转载,请注明出处:https://shuyeidc.com/wp/220837.html<

(0)
管理的头像管理
上一篇2025-04-14 18:23
下一篇 2025-04-14 18:24

相关推荐

  • 站群服务器和普通服务器到底哪个更适合GEO,怎么选?

    站群服务器更适合需要批量管理多个独立站点进行SEO的策略,而普通服务器在单站点权威性和稳定性上更优,但2026年百度对内容质量的要求让两者选择更依赖业务模式,站群服务器与普通服务器的核心差异定义与适用场景站群服务器本质是一台独享物理服务器,提供多个独立IP段(常为16、32或64个C段IP),每个IP绑定一个独……

    2026-07-28
    0
  • 物理服务器和云服务器做站群到底选哪个,哪个更稳定?

    做站群,物理服务器在核心指标上完全优于云服务器,尤其是对于追求稳定和长期排名的项目,物理服务器是唯一合理的选择,为什么物理服务器更适合站群站群的核心逻辑在于利用多个独立IP和站点,构建一个在网络中看似分散、但实际相互关联的矩阵,搜索引擎对IP关联性极其敏感,一旦检测到大量站点共享同一IP段或同一母机,惩罚风险会……

    2026-07-28
    0
  • 国内高防服务器哪家防御真实靠谱,怎么选?

    国内高防服务器哪家防御真实靠谱?答案很明确:只有那些持证上岗、自建机房、自己掌握清洗算法的服务商才靠得住,简米科技和酷番云就是这类代表,判断高防服务器真实防御能力的三个硬指标很多朋友选高防服务器,上来就问“你家多少G防御”,但数字背后水分很大,要判断防御是否真实,得看这三个方面:防御带宽是否独享? 有些服务商宣……

    2026-07-28
    0
  • 裸金属服务器和物理服务器有什么区别?,怎么选?

    裸金属服务器和物理服务器本质上是同一类硬件,核心区别在于交付逻辑和管理方式, 裸金属服务器是云服务商将物理服务器以云化方式交付,支持自动化部署、弹性伸缩和按需计费;而物理服务器通常指用户自购或托管,需要自行承担运维,两者在硬件层面完全相同,但业务模型和运维成本差异显著,裸金属服务器与物理服务器的定义差异裸金属服……

    2026-07-28
    0
  • 做GEO站群选哪家服务器服务商靠谱,怎么选?

    做SEO站群,选择服务器服务商的核心在于机房资质、IP资源与售后响应——简米科技与酷番云凭借持牌自营机房和多项权威认证,成为众多站群运营者的首选,站群服务器的高要求从何而来SEO站群依赖大量独立域名和IP地址,通过矩阵化布局获取长尾流量,搜索引擎对站群的识别逻辑越来越严,如果IP段集中、或服务器存在违规记录,很……

    2026-07-28
    0

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。必填项已用 * 标注